Fortnite’s Foul-Mouthed AI Darth Vader Sparks Major Controversy

AI Chat - Image Generator:
Epic Games introduced an AI-powered Darth Vader using a clone of the actor's iconic voice, which immediately stirred up a hornet's nest.

In case you haven’t heard, Fortnite — the megahit video game from Epic Games that’s stuffed with characters from every media franchise imaginable, not to mention real celebrities — has become a cause célèbre after it introduced Darth Vader as an in-game boss. 

This was no ordinary homage to the “Star Wars” villain. It uses “conversational AI” to recreate the iconic voice of the late actor James Earl Jones, allowing gamers to chat with the Sith Lord and ask him pretty much any question they want.

Though it’s resulted in plenty of light-hearted fun, gamers, being gamers, immediately set to work tricking the AI into swearing and saying slurs.

But that’s only the beginning of the controversy, if you can believe it. 

On Monday, the Screen Actor’s Guild blasted Epic Games for its AI Vader stunt and filed an unfair labor complaint against the developer with the National Labor Relations Board, arguing that Epic’s use of AI violated their agreement by replacing human performers without notice.

“Fortnite’s signatory company, Llama Productions, chose to replace the work of human performers with AI technology,” SAG-AFTRA said in a statement. “Unfortunately, they did so without providing any notice of their intent to do this and without bargaining with us over appropriate terms.” 

SAG-AFTRA is still on strike against the video game industry, though actors are still allowed work on Fortnite and some other exempted projects, notes the Hollywood Reporter. Voice actors, in general, have struggled to win the same protections against AI as other performers in other fields. It’s easier and far cheaper to fake someone’s voice and pass it off as real than it is to mimic a visual performance.

For this stunt, Epic used Google’s Gemini 2.0 model to generate the wording of Vader’s responses, and ElevenLabs’ Flash v2.5 model for the audio.

Whatever your thoughts on the ethics of resurrecting a dead actor’s voice with AI, no theft is involved with Epic’s AI Vader  — just, if SAG is to be believed, dubious labor practices. It was created in collaboration with Jones’ estate, according to an Epic press release featuring a statement from the family. Jones, shortly before he passed away, signed a contract with Disney allowing the AI startup Respeecher to clone his voice. 

That’s all fine with SAG-AFTRA. It doesn’t necessarily have a problem with actors — or their estates — licensing AI replicas of themselves. 

“However, we must protect our right to bargain terms and conditions around uses of voice that replace the work of our members,” the union wrote, “including those who previously did the work of matching Darth Vader’s iconic rhythm and tone in video games.”

We’ll have to see what the labor board and Epic make of SAG-AFTRA’s claims. In the meantime, it’s pretty jarring to see an AI version of Jones’ legendary Vader performance out in the wild and answering silly questions in a video game.

More on AI: Even Audiobooks Aren’t Safe From AI Slop

The post Fortnite’s Foul-Mouthed AI Darth Vader Sparks Major Controversy appeared first on Futurism.

Even Audiobooks Aren’t Safe From AI Slop

AI Chat - Image Generator:
Audible announced new AI narration tools that publishers can use to churn out entire AI-generated audiobooks.

Audible, one of the world’s largest audiobook platforms, is opening the floodgates to AI slop.

On Tuesday, the Amazon-owned service announced its new “integrated AI narration technology” that’ll allow selected publishers to rapidly churn out audiobooks using a wide range of AI-generated voices. 

It’s Audible’s biggest foray into AI yet, and will be a major blow for voice actors, who are fighting tooth and nail to win protections against the technology, particularly in the US video games industry, where they are still on strike.

 “The use of AI to replace human creativity is in itself a dangerous path,” Stephen Briggs, a voice over artist known for narrating the works of Terry Pratchett, told The Guardian.

In the announcement, Audible boasted that book publishers can choose from more than 100 AI-generated voices in English, Spanish, French, and Italian, with multiple accents and dialect options. And as an added incentive, it’s offering better royalty rates to authors who use Audible’s AI to create an audiobook exclusively for the platform, Bloomberg reported.

Audible also plans to roll out a beta version of an AI translation feature later in 2025, offering to either have a human narrator read a translated manuscript or use AI to translate an existing audiobook narrator’s performance into another language.

Audible says it’s working on support for translations from English to Spanish, French, Italian, and German, and publishers, should they choose to, can review the translations through a professional linguist hired by Audible.

“Audible believes that AI represents a momentous opportunity to expand the availability of audiobooks with the vision of offering customers every book in every language, alongside our continued investments in premium original content,” CEO Bob Carrigan said in a statement, “ensuring listeners worldwide can access extraordinary books that might otherwise never reach their ears.”

It’s a shocking announcement, but the writing has been on the wall for a while now. Last September, Amazon started a trial program allowing audiobook narrators to generate AI clones of their voice. And in 2023, Amazon launched an AI-generated “virtual voice” feature that could transform self-published author’s titles into audiobooks. Today, more than 60,000 of these titles are narrated with Audible’s virtual voice, according to Bloomberg.

Audible argues that by using AI, it’s expanding its audience and breaking down language barriers. But audiobook narrators, authors, and translators aren’t buying that the company has wholly good intentions. As always, it’ll be human creatives that’ll be getting the short end of the stick — all in service of creating an inferior product.

“No one pretends to use AI for translation, audiobooks, or even writing books because they are better; the only excuse is that they are cheaper,” Frank Wynne, a renowned translator of French and Spanish literature into English, told The Guardian. “Which is only true if you ignore the vast processing power even the simplest AI request requires. In the search for a cheap simulacra to an actual human, we are prepared to burn down the planet and call it progress.”

“The art — and it is an art  — of a good audiobook is the crack in the voice at a moment of unexpected emotion, the wryness of good comedy timing, or the disbelief a listener feels when one person can convincingly be a whole cast of characters,” Kristein Atherton, who’s narrated over four hundred audiobooks on Audible, told the newspaper. “No matter how ‘human’ an AI voice sounds, it’s those little intricacies that turn a good book into an excellent one. AI can’t replicate that.”

More on AI: NBC Using AI to Bring Beloved NBA Narrator Jim Fagan Back From the Grave

The post Even Audiobooks Aren’t Safe From AI Slop appeared first on Futurism.