{"id":10197,"date":"2026-04-13T20:16:36","date_gmt":"2026-04-13T20:16:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/coalition-rights-meta-glasses-facial-recognition\/"},"modified":"2026-04-13T20:16:36","modified_gmt":"2026-04-13T20:16:36","slug":"coalition-rights-meta-glasses-facial-recognition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/coalition-rights-meta-glasses-facial-recognition\/","title":{"rendered":"Huge Group of Experts Warns Meta That Its Pervert Glasses Will Enable Terrible Crimes"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Last month, a joint investigation<\/a> by two Swedish newspapers found that contractors in Kenya were watching personal videos<\/a> recorded by users of Meta\u2019s Ray Ban AI glasses.<\/p>\n

The devices, which can easily be used to film others in public without their knowledge or consent, have been facing a growing backlash online, with netizens calling them out<\/a> for being \u201cpervert glasses.\u201d<\/p>\n

Now, Meta\u2019s plans to add facial recognition tech to its hardware, as part of a new feature internally dubbed \u201cName Tag,\u201d has outraged rights groups. As Wired<\/em> reports<\/a>, a coalition of over 70 civil liberties, domestic violence, LGBTQ+, labor, and immigrant advocacy organizations has signed a petition<\/a>, calling on Meta to cancel it altogether.<\/p>\n

In February, the New York Times<\/em> first reported<\/a> on the facial recognition feature, which would let wearers identity people and receive information about them via an AI assistant. An internal document viewed by the newspaper revealed that Meta was planning to first roll out the feature at a conference for the blind.<\/p>\n

Ironically, Meta expected rights groups to be too busy to step in, given the disastrous geopolitical climate.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns,\u201d the document reads, as quoted by the NYT<\/em>.<\/p>\n

But given the latest news, plenty are lining up to oppose the new feature. In a public letter addressed to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg<\/a>, the coalition called on the billionaire to \u201cimmediately halt and publicly disavow its plans to deploy facial recognition features on its Ray-Ban and Oakley glasses.\u201d<\/p>\n

The group specifically singled out Meta for \u201ctaking advantage of rising authoritarianism and this federal administration\u2019s disregard for the rule of law to roll out a product that will harm vulnerable people while further imperiling our democracy,\u201d describing the act as \u201cvile behavior, unbecoming of a company with such a prominent role in shaping our children, our society, and our future.\u201d<\/p>\n

The coalition is made up of 75 civil liberties groups, including the ACLU, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, GLAAD, Mothers Against Media Addiction, Reproductive Equity Now, and the Women\u2019s Bar Association of Massachusetts.<\/p>\n

\u201cFor two decades, it has been clear that the ethos of \u2018move fast and break things\u2019 exploits consumers, endangers vulnerable communities, and profoundly undermines civil rights and civil liberties,\u201d the letter reads. \u201cMeta\u2019s new plans will only compound that disastrous track record.\u201d<\/p>\n

Such a feature \u201ccannot be resolved through product design changes, opt-out mechanisms, or incremental safeguards,\u201d the coalition argued, especially considering bystanders in public have no way to consent to being identified by the glasses.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s an especially precarious situation, given the Trump administration\u2019s militarization of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, whose agents have been using cutting-edge tech<\/a> to identify their targets.<\/p>\n

\u201cPeople should be able to move through their daily lives without fear that stalkers, scammers, abusers, federal agents, and activists across the political spectrum are silently and invisibly verifying their identities and potentially matching their names to a wealth of readily available data about their habits, hobbies, relationships, health, and behaviors,\u201d the coalition wrote in its letter.<\/p>\n

As Wired<\/em> points out, if Meta were to shut down the facial recognition feature, it wouldn\u2019t be the first time. In late 2021, the company canceled a Facebook phototagging feature<\/a> that used the tech to identify individuals.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe need to weigh the positive use cases for facial recognition against growing societal concerns, especially as regulators have yet to provide clear rules,\u201d the company wrote in an announcement at the time.<\/p>\n

Meta has also been ordered to pay billions of dollars<\/a> to settle biometric privacy lawsuits<\/a>, some of which were related to the use of facial recognition software<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen you move fast, you break things \u2014 and in this case, the casualties may well include our democracy, our privacy, and countless individuals, families, and communities,\u201d the coalition\u2019s letter reads. \u201cAn approach to technology that privatizes profit and socializes harm carries with it irreversible consequences for people\u2019s safety, liberty, and civil rights.\u201d<\/p>\n

More on the glasses:<\/strong> We Can\u2019t Even Imagine the Eating Disorders This New Meta Smart Glasses Feature Will Cause<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

The post Huge Group of Experts Warns Meta That Its Pervert Glasses Will Enable Terrible Crimes<\/a> appeared first on Futurism<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Last month, a joint investigation by two Swedish newspapers found that contractors in Kenya were watching personal videos recorded by users of Meta\u2019s Ray Ban AI glasses. The devices, which…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[177,1177,4260,3842,189,3186],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10197","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-artificial-intelligence","category-cybersecurity","category-data-privacy","category-future-society","category-meta","category-privacy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10197","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10197"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10197\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10197"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10197"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10197"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}