{"id":5598,"date":"2025-09-30T19:14:57","date_gmt":"2025-09-30T19:14:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/jim-cramer-ai-bubble\/"},"modified":"2025-09-30T19:14:57","modified_gmt":"2025-09-30T19:14:57","slug":"jim-cramer-ai-bubble","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/jim-cramer-ai-bubble\/","title":{"rendered":"You Might Want to Ditch Your AI Investments Now That Jim Cramer Says No Bubble Is Coming"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

We\u2019re not in the business of making financial recommendations, but CNBC<\/em> personality Jim Cramer says there\u2019s no bubble coming for the AI sector \u2014 which, given his track record, should probably make any AI investors just a bit nervous.<\/p>\n

Now that Cramer \u2014 whose calls have historically underperformed so much that he inspired an entire phenomenon of people betting against him, called the \u201cInverse Cramer<\/a>\u201d effect \u2014 has chimed in on the topic, netizens are worried about an imminent collapse.<\/p>\n

\u201cOh god, it\u2019s worse than we thought,\u201d one Reddit user wrote<\/a> in a tongue-in-cheek post. \u201cThe grim reaper of finance has weighed in, the collapse of the global financial system is imminent.\u201d<\/p>\n

Cramer has made plenty of disastrous calls over decades. In February 2000, he proclaimed<\/a> that internet-related companies \u201care the only ones worth owning right now\u201d \u2014 right before the dot-com collapse. In 2012, he bet against stalwarts like HP, Netflix<\/a>, both of which soared following his sell notice. Hes even been accused<\/a> of playing a part in the 2008 financial crisis.<\/p>\n

His latest prognostication? That he doesn\u2019t believe the immense spending on AI infrastructure has any parallels with the dot-com bubble from 25 years ago \u2014 yes, the same one he didn\u2019t see coming back in the day, either.<\/p>\n

He\u2019s breaking, of course, with experts who have drawn<\/a> connections for quite some time now<\/a>, with some arguing<\/a> that the current AI bubble may be even worse<\/em> than the market conditions leading up to the dot-com implosion of the early 2000s.<\/p>\n

The stakes are considerable, with investors warning<\/a> that spending on AI has contributed more to the growth of the US economy so far this year than all of consumer spending combined, foreshadowing a rude awakening. The sheer amount of resources being poured into AI could even mean that a crash could take down the US economy with it<\/a>, some have argued.<\/p>\n

As a result, Cramer has become the target of ridicule on social media.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Jim Cramer says investors \u201cshould not worry about a US government shutdown\u201d pic.twitter.com\/AHTxj0zt9k<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Inverse Cramer (@CramerTracker) September 30, 2025<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

The trouble started when Cramer pushed back against dot-com bubble comparisons on Monday, arguing that Big Tech is simply too big to fail<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cSpeaking as an internet pioneer, what I see now is the polar opposite of what we were seeing 25 years ago,\u201d he said. <\/p>\n

\u201cWhen the dot-coms made bad investments, nearly all of them went under,\u201d he added. \u201cBut, worst case scenario, if Google and Amazon and Meta make bad investments and take big losses, that\u2019s just another day at the office.\u201d<\/p>\n

Cramer argued that thanks to an enormous amount of available cash, tech giants could write off debt as needed \u2014 or pivot, i<\/strong>f AI turns out to be a dead end.<\/p>\n

However, the analyst remained optimistic about AI tech becoming useful enough to justify enormous spending.<\/p>\n

Naturally, Cramer didn\u2019t want to stick his neck out too much, arguing that he wasn\u2019t willing to write off the \u201cdot-com bomb scenario\u201d entirely.<\/p>\n

\u201cSee, the skepticism keeps things in check,\u201d he said. \u201cIf there weren\u2019t such a negative bent to the story right now, everyone would be in this pool, and we\u2019d all drown.\u201d<\/p>\n

Whether others will agree with his line of thinking remains to be seen, especially as analysts see more and more red flags going up. Last week, AI chipmaker Nvidia announced a $100 billion investment in its own biggest customer, OpenAI, once again fueling fears over an AI bubble<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Analysts called it out<\/a> as an example of \u201ccircular financing,\u201d with Nvidia propping up a company important to its own bottom line.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s kind of like having your parents co-sign on your first mortgage,\u201d Bloomberg<\/em>\u2018s Jay Goldberg argued<\/a>, describing the deal as \u201cbubble-like behavior.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen times are good, this is going to make things better,\u201d he added. \u201cWe\u2019re going to grow faster; numbers are going to go up much faster.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cBut when the cycle turns, and it will turn, it makes things worse on the downside,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n

More on the AI bubble:<\/strong> The AI Bubble Bursting Would Actually Be Incredible for the Economy, Economist Says<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

The post You Might Want to Ditch Your AI Investments Now That Jim Cramer Says No Bubble Is Coming<\/a> appeared first on Futurism<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

We\u2019re not in the business of making financial recommendations, but CNBC personality Jim Cramer says there\u2019s no bubble coming for the AI sector \u2014 which, given his track record, should…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[177,3841,3842,179],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5598","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-artificial-intelligence","category-ethics","category-future-society","category-openai"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5598","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5598"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5598\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5598"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5598"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}