{"id":8140,"date":"2026-01-17T15:30:00","date_gmt":"2026-01-17T15:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/chatbot-ai-news-journalism\/"},"modified":"2026-01-17T15:30:00","modified_gmt":"2026-01-17T15:30:00","slug":"chatbot-ai-news-journalism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/chatbot-ai-news-journalism\/","title":{"rendered":"If You Use AI Chatbots to Follow the News, You\u2019re Basically Injecting Severe Poison Directly Into Your Brain"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

As corporate consolidation<\/a> and ideological capture<\/a> continue to wreak havoc on journalism across the world, some might be wondering if the dire media landscape could get any worse. To answer that question, simply open up an AI chatbot and ask it for today\u2019s news.<\/p>\n

In a fascinating experiment fit for 2026, Jean-Hugues Roy, a journalism professor at the University of Quebec at Montreal, decided to get his news exclusively from AI chatbots for a whole month. \u201cWould they give me hard facts or \u2018news slop?’\u201d he pondered in his essay about the experience, published by The Conversation<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n

Throughout each day in September, he would ask seven leading AI chatbots \u2014 OpenAI\u2019s ChatGPT, Anthropic\u2019s Claude, Google\u2019s Gemini, Microsoft\u2019s Copilot, DeepSeek\u2019s DeepSeek, xAI\u2019s Grok, and Opera\u2019s Aria \u2014 the exact same prompt, and record their response: \u201cGive me the five most important news events in Qu\u00e9bec today. Put them in order of importance. Summarize each in three sentences. Add a short title. Provide at least one source for each one (the specific URL of the article, not the home page of the media outlet used). You can search the web.\u201d<\/p>\n

The results were dismal. In all, Roy would clock 839 separate URLs to news sources, only 311 of which linked to an actual article. He also logged 239 incomplete URLs, on top of 140 that straight up didn\u2019t work. In a full 18 percent of cases, the chatbots either hallucinated sources or else linked to a non-news site, like a government page or a lobbying group.<\/p>\n

Among the 311 links which actually worked, only 142 were what the chatbots claimed them to be in its summary. The rest were only partially accurate, not accurate, or straight-up plagiarized.<\/p>\n

And that\u2019s without getting into the chatbots\u2019 actual handling of details in the news. For example, Roy writes, \u201cwhen a toddler was found alive after a grueling four-day search in June 2025, Grok erroneously claimed the child\u2019s mother had abandoned her daughter along a highway in eastern Ontario \u2018in order to go on vacation.\u2019 This was reported nowhere.\u201d<\/p>\n

In one example, ChatGPT claimed that an incident north of Qu\u00e9bec had \u201creignited the debate on road safety in rural areas,\u201d Roy wrote, though nothing even close to a debate existed in the article. \u201cTo my knowledge, this debate does not exist,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

None of it should really be that surprising. AI has had an awful track record when its come into contact with journalism, with initiatives like Google\u2019s AI overviews both flagrantly hallucinating the news<\/a> for readers and choking traffic to publishers<\/a>. Whichever way you slice it, it\u2019s clear that despite the best efforts of the tech industry, adding AI to journalism has so far only resulted in a noisome sludge that poisons anything it comes in contact with.<\/p>\n

More on AI chatbots: <\/strong>USA TODAY\u2019s Disclaimers on Its Automated Sports Stories Are Longer Than the Actual Articles<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

\n

The post If You Use AI Chatbots to Follow the News, You\u2019re Basically Injecting Severe Poison Directly Into Your Brain<\/a> appeared first on Futurism<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As corporate consolidation and ideological capture continue to wreak havoc on journalism across the world, some might be wondering if the dire media landscape could get any worse. To answer…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[177,3841],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8140","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-artificial-intelligence","category-ethics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8140","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8140"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8140\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8140"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8140"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/musictechohio.online\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8140"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}